<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://studiesinscripture.com/in-the-name-of-the-father-and-of-the-son-and-of-the-holy-ghost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://studiesinscripture.com/in-the-name-of-the-father-and-of-the-son-and-of-the-holy-ghost/</link>
	<description>Growing in God&#039;s Word</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:44:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy A. Brown</title>
		<link>http://studiesinscripture.com/in-the-name-of-the-father-and-of-the-son-and-of-the-holy-ghost/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy A. Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiesinscripture.com/?p=184#comment-512</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul. The Father and the Son are not one in the same, or interchangeable. The term &#039;Father&#039; refers to Deity and the term &#039;Son&#039; refers to the humanity of Jesus. They are not the same nature or aspect of Jesus. Jesus could speak as a man or as God. We see this all throughout Scripture. I cover John 14:23  in more detail in this article:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://studiesinscripture.com/our-abode/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Our Abode&lt;/a&gt;

Please take a look.

Thanks,

Randy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul. The Father and the Son are not one in the same, or interchangeable. The term &#8216;Father&#8217; refers to Deity and the term &#8216;Son&#8217; refers to the humanity of Jesus. They are not the same nature or aspect of Jesus. Jesus could speak as a man or as God. We see this all throughout Scripture. I cover John 14:23  in more detail in this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://studiesinscripture.com/our-abode/" rel="nofollow">Our Abode</a></p>
<p>Please take a look.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul L Rothermel</title>
		<link>http://studiesinscripture.com/in-the-name-of-the-father-and-of-the-son-and-of-the-holy-ghost/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul L Rothermel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiesinscripture.com/?p=184#comment-511</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Randy,&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;If the Father and the Son were One Person instead of Two, Jesus would NEVER have said:  &quot;If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and WE will come unto him, and make our abode with him.&quot;  How do you explain the &quot;we&quot;?  If your view is right, Jesus should have said &quot;I,&quot; not &quot;we.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;PAUL&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Randy,</strong><br />
<strong>If the Father and the Son were One Person instead of Two, Jesus would NEVER have said:  &#8220;If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and WE will come unto him, and make our abode with him.&#8221;  How do you explain the &#8220;we&#8221;?  If your view is right, Jesus should have said &#8220;I,&#8221; not &#8220;we.&#8221;</strong><br />
<strong>PAUL</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio</title>
		<link>http://studiesinscripture.com/in-the-name-of-the-father-and-of-the-son-and-of-the-holy-ghost/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiesinscripture.com/?p=184#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Matt 28:19 is the last command Jesus gives before ascending up into heaven.
When the day of Pentecost is fully come this commandment is followed by Peter who preaches the first plan of
salvation in Acts 2:38. This is not a disobedience to the words of Christ but an understanding that Jesus is the
Father, Son, and the Holy spirit. If anyone knew what the Lord Jesus wanted it would of been his right hand man, Peter who also had the keys to the kingdom.  This is not a contradiction in scripture but total fulfillment and obedience to lord Jesus Christ.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt 28:19 is the last command Jesus gives before ascending up into heaven.<br />
When the day of Pentecost is fully come this commandment is followed by Peter who preaches the first plan of<br />
salvation in Acts 2:38. This is not a disobedience to the words of Christ but an understanding that Jesus is the<br />
Father, Son, and the Holy spirit. If anyone knew what the Lord Jesus wanted it would of been his right hand man, Peter who also had the keys to the kingdom.  This is not a contradiction in scripture but total fulfillment and obedience to lord Jesus Christ.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessica</title>
		<link>http://studiesinscripture.com/in-the-name-of-the-father-and-of-the-son-and-of-the-holy-ghost/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiesinscripture.com/?p=184#comment-308</guid>
		<description>I agree with what is written here. However, I am still confused a little. I was raised to be baptized in the &quot;father, son, holy spirit&quot; &amp; that&#039;s how I was baptized. I know people who recieved the holy spirit after being baptized this way. How is that possible if the only way to do it is in Jesus name?
I have not received it yet &amp; plan on being rebaptized on the name of Jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with what is written here. However, I am still confused a little. I was raised to be baptized in the &#8220;father, son, holy spirit&#8221; &amp; that&#8217;s how I was baptized. I know people who recieved the holy spirit after being baptized this way. How is that possible if the only way to do it is in Jesus name?<br />
I have not received it yet &amp; plan on being rebaptized on the name of Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://studiesinscripture.com/in-the-name-of-the-father-and-of-the-son-and-of-the-holy-ghost/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 00:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiesinscripture.com/?p=184#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Almost every Bible scholar, Oneness and Trinitarian alike, agree that these (Matt. 28:19) were not the accual words of Jesus.  Most say that the original Greek text read more along the lines of:
&quot;Go and make disciples of all the nations (some add &#039;baptizing them...&#039;) &lt;strong&gt;in my name&lt;/strong&gt;, teaching them to observe all things I have commanded you.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost every Bible scholar, Oneness and Trinitarian alike, agree that these (Matt. 28:19) were not the accual words of Jesus.  Most say that the original Greek text read more along the lines of:<br />
&#8220;Go and make disciples of all the nations (some add &#8216;baptizing them&#8230;&#8217;) <strong>in my name</strong>, teaching them to observe all things I have commanded you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David@wordofpromise</title>
		<link>http://studiesinscripture.com/in-the-name-of-the-father-and-of-the-son-and-of-the-holy-ghost/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>David@wordofpromise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 21:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiesinscripture.com/?p=184#comment-87</guid>
		<description>It is hard to argue the fact of the truthfulness of this &quot;in the name&quot; debate. To me it is pretty clear that they baptized in Jesus name in nearly every instance but what is also interesting is that not every baptism had an evidence of spiritual gifts as David Bernard and others seem to put a premium on for initial placement of anointing from God</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to argue the fact of the truthfulness of this &#8220;in the name&#8221; debate. To me it is pretty clear that they baptized in Jesus name in nearly every instance but what is also interesting is that not every baptism had an evidence of spiritual gifts as David Bernard and others seem to put a premium on for initial placement of anointing from God</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

